|
|
|
|
|
|
February 15th, 2005, 05:51 PM
|
#1
|
Shades of Gray
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New London, Ohio
Posts: 914
|
Babylon 5's Straczynski Wants To Reboot Trek
From Scifi.com...
"Straczynski Wants To Reboot Trek
Inspired by a recent SCI FI Wire poll, Babylon 5 creator J. Michael Straczynski posted a message to a newsgroup urging fans to write to Paramount, owner of the rights to the Star Trek franchise, in support of a new Trek series that he and Bryce Zabel (Dark Skies) developed last year.
Although the studio originally passed on the treatment due to "political considerations," Straczynski feels that they might reconsider if they knew that fans were eager for such an idea. "I'm taking the unusual step of going right to the source ... right to you guys," Straczynski said in the message. "Fueled in part by a number of recent articles and polls, including one at www.scifi.com/scifiwire in which nearly 18,000 fans voted their preference for a new Trek series, and 48 percent of that figure called for a [J. Michael Straczynski] take on Trek."
Straczynski said that he and Zabel share an affection for the original Star Trek series, and a disappointment in the later iterations of the series. Together, they created a new treatment and a five-year story arc with the intention of returning to the roots of the world created by Gene Roddenberry. "If you want to see a new Trek series that's true to Gene's original creation, helmed by myself and Bryce, with challenging stories, contemporary themes, solid extrapolation, and the infusion of some of our best and brightest SF prose writers, then you need to let the folks at Paramount know that. If the 48 percent of the 18,000 folks who voted at SciFi.com sent those sentiments to Paramount, there'd be a new series in the works tomorrow," Straczynski said.
Straczynski added that he felt that the current stewards of the series have been too cautious in their stories, and the franchise has suffered as a result. "Over time, Trek was treated like a Porsche that's kept in the garage all the time, for fear of scratching the finish," Straczynski said. "The stories were, for the most part, safe, more about technology than what William Faulkner described as 'the human heart in conflict with itself.' Yes, there were always exceptions, but in general that trend became more and more apparent with the passage of years. Which was why so often I came down on the later stories, which I did openly, because I didn't feel they lined up with what Trek was created to be. I don't apologize for it, because that was what I felt as a fan of Trek. That's why I had [Roddenberry's widow Majel Barrett] appear on B5, to send a message that I believe in what Gene created."
__________________
|
|
|
|
February 15th, 2005, 07:48 PM
|
#2
|
Bad Email Address
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lost in the Neutral Zone
Posts: 656
|
The whole story isn't there.....
Read the entire TrekWeb JMS article or JMS NEWS .... this is what JMS issued later:
"UPDATE : Straczynski just posted another message, which follows :
"Actually...belay everything I just said.
In the 24 hours between the time I composed the prior note, and sent it, and it made its way through the moderation software, two things happened:
1) I heard from a trusted source that Paramount is giving the Trek TV world a rest for maybe one to two years, depending on circumstances, no matter who would come along to run it. So it's not right to have folks putting in time doing something that ultimately would be pointless, I don't think that's a proper use of anybody's time.
2) At the same time as the above, an offer came in to run a new TV series for fall of '06, and since there's no way anything Trek can happen in the interim, I've said yes (now we have to negotiate the deal, but that should be fairly straightforward).
So on two counts, the whole thing is kind of moot.
We can reconvene a year or two down the road to see where this takes us, but in the interim...my apologies for waking everybody up in the middle of the night.
As you were.
Thanks and with great chagrinedness --
jms""
Edit: Here's a avatar/signature that's been made available for fans to use:
|
|
|
|
February 15th, 2005, 07:49 PM
|
#3
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 880
|
I'm fine with JMS taking over as the EP for a new Trek, as long as we have it in writing that he will never ever write the dialogue for any episode himself.
EVER.
|
|
|
|
February 15th, 2005, 08:44 PM
|
#4
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragmentary
I'm fine with JMS taking over as the EP for a new Trek, as long as we have it in writing that he will never ever write the dialogue for any episode himself.
EVER.
|
Come on!!!!! You would rather have Berman and Braga writing dialog than JMS? What, do you watch TV with the sound off?
|
|
|
|
February 16th, 2005, 12:26 AM
|
#5
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 880
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bijou88
Come on!!!!! You would rather have Berman and Braga writing dialog than JMS? What, do you watch TV with the sound off?
|
Hey, I'm willing to agree that he's a very creative guy with some fantastic ideas and stories. BUT, his dialogue causes me physical distress. My throat gets sore from all the groaning, and my eyes get whiplash from all the rolling.
However, the guy can write a mean cartoon.
|
|
|
|
February 16th, 2005, 05:24 PM
|
#6
|
Strike Leader
| Administrator | | Battlestar Pacifica | | Battlestar Rycon |
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Delray Beach, Florida
Posts: 2,949
|
I really wonder how JMS would have done with the BG franchise. I loved Babylon 5.
|
|
|
|
February 16th, 2005, 07:19 PM
|
#7
|
Bad Email Address
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,280
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragmentary
However, the guy can write a mean cartoon.
|
I seem to remember Masters Of The Universe and She-Ra from my younger days.
Hell, the first mention of the Centauri food 'spoo' was in She-Ra!
|
|
|
|
February 24th, 2005, 03:44 AM
|
#8
|
Strike Leader
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Viper Mk II, Patroling the Fleet
Posts: 2,368
|
Sounds cool
__________________
CAG, Battlestar Medusa BSG-64
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For fans of the Classic Battlestar Galactica series
|
|
|